| Title |
A giant planet candidate transiting a white dwarf
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-2713-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Vanderburg, Saul A. Rappaport, Siyi Xu, Ian J. M. Crossfield, Juliette C. Becker, Bruce Gary, Felipe Murgas, Simon Blouin, Thomas G. Kaye, Enric Palle, Carl Melis, Brett M. Morris, Laura Kreidberg, Varoujan Gorjian, Caroline V. Morley, Andrew W. Mann, Hannu Parviainen, Logan A. Pearce, Elisabeth R. Newton, Andreia Carrillo, Ben Zuckerman, Lorne Nelson, Greg Zeimann, Warren R. Brown, René Tronsgaard, Beth Klein, George R. Ricker, Roland K. Vanderspek, David W. Latham, Sara Seager, Joshua N. Winn, Jon M. Jenkins, Fred C. Adams, Björn Benneke, David Berardo, Lars A. Buchhave, Douglas A. Caldwell, Jessie L. Christiansen, Karen A. Collins, Knicole D. Colón, Tansu Daylan, John Doty, Alexandra E. Doyle, Diana Dragomir, Courtney Dressing, Patrick Dufour, Akihiko Fukui, Ana Glidden, Natalia M. Guerrero, Xueying Guo, Kevin Heng, Andreea I. Henriksen, Chelsea X. Huang, Lisa Kaltenegger, Stephen R. Kane, John A. Lewis, Jack J. Lissauer, Farisa Morales, Norio Narita, Joshua Pepper, Mark E. Rose, Jeffrey C. Smith, Keivan G. Stassun, Liang Yu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 611 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 87 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 52 | 9% |
| Spain | 28 | 5% |
| France | 23 | 4% |
| Japan | 23 | 4% |
| Mexico | 14 | 2% |
| Australia | 10 | 2% |
| Canada | 10 | 2% |
| Germany | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 70 | 11% |
| Unknown | 287 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 433 | 71% |
| Scientists | 154 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 20% |
| Researcher | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 54 | 55% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1680. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,492
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#693
of 98,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#335
of 416,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#40
of 811 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 811 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.