| Title |
Risk Prediction for Peripartum Cardiomyopathy in Delivering Mothers: A Validated Risk Model PPCM Risk Prediction Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cardiac Failure, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.12.022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melinda B Davis, Jennifer Jarvie, Ellise Gambahaya, Joann Lindenfeld, David Kao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 41% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Algeria | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Librarian | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Energy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,040,809
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiac Failure
#310
of 2,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,025
of 519,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiac Failure
#15
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.