| Title |
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with severe respiratory failure from COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-020-06331-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shahzad Shaefi, Samantha K. Brenner, Shruti Gupta, Brian P. O’Gara, Megan L. Krajewski, David M. Charytan, Sobaata Chaudhry, Sara H. Mirza, Vasil Peev, Mark Anderson, Anip Bansal, Salim S. Hayek, Anand Srivastava, Kusum S. Mathews, Tanya S. Johns, Amanda Leonberg-Yoo, Adam Green, Justin Arunthamakun, Keith M. Wille, Tanveer Shaukat, Harkarandeep Singh, Andrew J. Admon, Matthew W. Semler, Miguel A. Hernán, Ariel L. Mueller, Wei Wang, David E. Leaf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 270 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 50 | 19% |
| Spain | 23 | 9% |
| Mexico | 11 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 4% |
| Argentina | 7 | 3% |
| Italy | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 6 | 2% |
| Colombia | 6 | 2% |
| Japan | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 52 | 19% |
| Unknown | 94 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 197 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 40 | 15% |
| Scientists | 28 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 218 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 13% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 18% |
| Unknown | 72 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 79 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 322. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#106,231
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#67
of 5,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,282
of 536,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 536,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.