↓ Skip to main content

Have process redesign methods, such as Lean, been successful in changing care delivery in hospitals? A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Public Money & Management, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Have process redesign methods, such as Lean, been successful in changing care delivery in hospitals? A systematic review
Published in
Public Money & Management, January 2015
DOI 10.1080/09540962.2015.1007714
Authors

Sandra G. Leggat, Timothy Bartram, Pauline Stanton, Greg J. Bamber, Amrik S. Sohal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 114 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Other 10 9%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 26 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 20 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 5%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 36 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,169,543
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Public Money &amp; Management
#324
of 554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,394
of 359,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Money &amp; Management
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.