| Title |
Global patterns of forest autotrophic carbon fluxes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Change Biology, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gcb.15574 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Banbury Morgan, Valentine Herrmann, Norbert Kunert, Ben Bond‐Lamberty, Helene C. Muller‐Landau, Kristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Poland | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 22% |
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 17 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,320,152
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#1,616
of 6,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,990
of 456,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#43
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.