| Title |
Liana optical traits increase tropical forest albedo and reduce ecosystem productivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Change Biology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gcb.15928 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Félicien Meunier, Marco D. Visser, Alexey Shiklomanov, Michael C. Dietze, J. Antonio Guzmán Q., G. Arturo Sanchez‐Azofeifa, Hannes P. T. De Deurwaerder, Sruthi M. Krishna Moorthy, Stefan A. Schnitzer, David C. Marvin, Marcos Longo, Chang Liu, Eben N. Broadbent, Angelica M. Almeyda Zambrano, Helene C. Muller‐Landau, Matteo Detto, Hans Verbeeck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 29% |
| Belgium | 2 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| French Guiana | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 52% |
| Scientists | 9 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,505,722
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#3,122
of 6,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,845
of 444,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#98
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.