| Title |
Predicting the potential for zoonotic transmission and host associations for novel viruses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Communications Biology, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s42003-022-03797-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pranav S. Pandit, Simon J. Anthony, Tracey Goldstein, Kevin J. Olival, Megan M. Doyle, Nicole R. Gardner, Brian Bird, Woutrina Smith, David Wolking, Kirsten Gilardi, Corina Monagin, Terra Kelly, Marcela M. Uhart, Jonathan H. Epstein, Catherine Machalaba, Melinda K. Rostal, Patrick Dawson, Emily Hagan, Ava Sullivan, Hongying Li, Aleksei A. Chmura, Alice Latinne, Christian Lange, Tammie O’Rourke, Sarah Olson, Lucy Keatts, A. Patricia Mendoza, Alberto Perez, Cátia Dejuste de Paula, Dawn Zimmerman, Marc Valitutto, Matthew LeBreton, David McIver, Ariful Islam, Veasna Duong, Moctar Mouiche, Zhengli Shi, Prime Mulembakani, Charles Kumakamba, Mohamed Ali, Nigatu Kebede, Ubald Tamoufe, Samuel Bel-Nono, Alpha Camara, Joko Pamungkas, Kalpy J. Coulibaly, Ehab Abu-Basha, Joseph Kamau, Soubanh Silithammavong, James Desmond, Tom Hughes, Enkhtuvshin Shiilegdamba, Ohnmar Aung, Dibesh Karmacharya, Julius Nziza, Daouda Ndiaye, Aiah Gbakima, Zikankuba Sajali, Supaporn Wacharapluesadee, Erika Alandia Robles, Benard Ssebide, Gerardo Suzán, Luis F. Aguirre, Monica R. Solorio, Tapan N. Dhole, Nguyen T. T. Nga, Peta L. Hitchens, Damien O. Joly, Karen Saylors, Amanda Fine, Suzan Murray, William B. Karesh, Peter Daszak, Jonna A. K. Mazet, Christine K. Johnson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 99 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 24% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 35 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 58% |
| Scientists | 36 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 23% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 209. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2023.
All research outputs
#189,487
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Communications Biology
#160
of 5,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,641
of 433,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications Biology
#15
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.