| Title |
Thermal sensitivity across forest vertical profiles: patterns, mechanisms, and ecological implications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New Phytologist, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nph.18539 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nidhi Vinod, Martijn Slot, Ian R. McGregor, Elsa M. Ordway, Marielle N. Smith, Tyeen C. Taylor, Lawren Sack, Thomas N. Buckley, Kristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 16% |
| France | 5 | 4% |
| India | 5 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Colombia | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 52% |
| Scientists | 57 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2023.
All research outputs
#584,583
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#289
of 9,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,647
of 487,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#13
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.