| Title |
The PhanSST global database of Phanerozoic sea surface temperature proxy data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Data, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41597-022-01826-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily J. Judd, Jessica E. Tierney, Brian T. Huber, Scott L. Wing, Daniel J. Lunt, Heather L. Ford, Gordon N. Inglis, Erin L. McClymont, Charlotte L. O’Brien, Ronnakrit Rattanasriampaipong, Weimin Si, Matthew L. Staitis, Kaustubh Thirumalai, Eleni Anagnostou, Margot J. Cramwinckel, Robin R. Dawson, David Evans, William R. Gray, Ethan L. Grossman, Michael J. Henehan, Brittany N. Hupp, Kenneth G. MacLeod, Lauren K. O’Connor, Maria Luisa Sánchez Montes, Haijun Song, Yi Ge Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 123 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 15% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 54 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 73 | 59% |
| Members of the public | 46 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Design | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#578,692
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#206
of 3,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,504
of 487,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#8
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.