| Title |
The time is right for an Antarctic biorepository network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2212800119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristin M. O’Brien, Elizabeth L. Crockett, Byron J. Adams, Charles D. Amsler, Hannah J. Appiah-Madson, Allen Collins, Thomas Desvignes, H. William Detrich, Daniel L. Distel, Sarah M. Eppley, Benjamin W. Frable, Nico M. Franz, Jeffrey M. Grim, Kevin M. Kocot, Andrew R. Mahon, Teresa J. Mayfield-Meyer, Jill A. Mikucki, William E. Moser, Michaela Schmull, Charlotte A. Seid, Craig R. Smith, Anne E. Todgham, Gregory J. Watkins-Colwell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 30% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 70% |
| Scientists | 14 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,156,345
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#16,999
of 103,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,313
of 486,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#296
of 851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 486,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.