| Title |
Evolutionary constraint and innovation across hundreds of placental mammals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abn3943 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew J. Christmas, Irene M. Kaplow, Diane P. Genereux, Michael X. Dong, Graham M. Hughes, Xue Li, Patrick F. Sullivan, Allyson G. Hindle, Gregory Andrews, Joel C. Armstrong, Matteo Bianchi, Ana M. Breit, Mark Diekhans, Cornelia Fanter, Nicole M. Foley, Daniel B. Goodman, Linda Goodman, Kathleen C. Keough, Bogdan Kirilenko, Amanda Kowalczyk, Colleen Lawless, Abigail L. Lind, Jennifer R. S. Meadows, Lucas R. Moreira, Ruby W. Redlich, Louise Ryan, Ross Swofford, Alejandro Valenzuela, Franziska Wagner, Ola Wallerman, Ashley R. Brown, Joana Damas, Kaili Fan, John Gatesy, Jenna Grimshaw, Jeremy Johnson, Sergey V. Kozyrev, Alyssa J. Lawler, Voichita D. Marinescu, Kathleen M. Morrill, Austin Osmanski, Nicole S. Paulat, BaDoi N. Phan, Steven K. Reilly, Daniel E. Schäffer, Cynthia Steiner, Megan A. Supple, Aryn P. Wilder, Morgan E. Wirthlin, James R. Xue, Bruce W. Birren, Steven Gazal, Robert M. Hubley, Klaus-Peter Koepfli, Tomas Marques-Bonet, Wynn K. Meyer, Martin Nweeia, Pardis C. Sabeti, Beth Shapiro, Arian F. A. Smit, Mark S. Springer, Emma C. Teeling, Zhiping Weng, Michael Hiller, Danielle L. Levesque, Harris A. Lewin, William J. Murphy, Arcadi Navarro, Benedict Paten, Katherine S. Pollard, David A. Ray, Irina Ruf, Oliver A. Ryder, Andreas R. Pfenning, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, Elinor K. Karlsson, Gregory Andrews, Joel C. Armstrong, Matteo Bianchi, Bruce W. Birren, Kevin R. Bredemeyer, Ana M. Breit, Matthew J. Christmas, Hiram Clawson, Joana Damas, Federica Di Palma, Mark Diekhans, Michael X. Dong, Eduardo Eizirik, Kaili Fan, Cornelia Fanter, Nicole M. Foley, Karin Forsberg-Nilsson, Carlos J. Garcia, John Gatesy, Steven Gazal, Diane P. Genereux, Linda Goodman, Jenna Grimshaw, Michaela K. Halsey, Andrew J. Harris, Glenn Hickey, Michael Hiller, Allyson G. Hindle, Robert M. Hubley, Graham M. Hughes, Jeremy Johnson, David Juan, Irene M. Kaplow, Elinor K. Karlsson, Kathleen C. Keough, Bogdan Kirilenko, Klaus-Peter Koepfli, Jennifer M. Korstian, Amanda Kowalczyk, Sergey V. Kozyrev, Alyssa J. Lawler, Colleen Lawless, Thomas Lehmann, Danielle L. Levesque, Harris A. Lewin, Xue Li, Abigail Lind, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, Ava Mackay-Smith, Voichita D. Marinescu, Tomas Marques-Bonet, Victor C. Mason, Jennifer R. S. Meadows, Wynn K. Meyer, Jill E. Moore, Lucas R. Moreira, Diana D. Moreno-Santillan, Kathleen M. Morrill, Gerard Muntané, William J. Murphy, Arcadi Navarro, Martin Nweeia, Sylvia Ortmann, Austin Osmanski, Benedict Paten, Nicole S. Paulat, Andreas R. Pfenning, BaDoi N. Phan, Katherine S. Pollard, Henry E. Pratt, David A. Ray, Steven K. Reilly, Jeb R. Rosen, Irina Ruf, Louise Ryan, Oliver A. Ryder, Pardis C. Sabeti, Daniel E. Schäffer, Aitor Serres, Beth Shapiro, Arian F. A. Smit, Mark Springer, Chaitanya Srinivasan, Cynthia Steiner, Jessica M. Storer, Kevin A. M. Sullivan, Patrick F. Sullivan, Elisabeth Sundström, Megan A. Supple, Ross Swofford, Joy-El Talbot, Emma Teeling, Jason Turner-Maier, Alejandro Valenzuela, Franziska Wagner, Ola Wallerman, Chao Wang, Juehan Wang, Zhiping Weng, Aryn P. Wilder, Morgan E. Wirthlin, James R. Xue, Xiaomeng Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,121 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 168 | 15% |
| Mexico | 51 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 43 | 4% |
| Spain | 36 | 3% |
| Japan | 28 | 2% |
| India | 26 | 2% |
| France | 22 | 2% |
| Brazil | 18 | 2% |
| Colombia | 18 | 2% |
| Other | 189 | 17% |
| Unknown | 522 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 808 | 72% |
| Scientists | 264 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 23 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 18% |
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 21% |
| Unknown | 48 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 47 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 53 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 653. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#33,827
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,444
of 83,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#920
of 413,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#37
of 413 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 413 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.