↓ Skip to main content

Modeling alternative future scenarios for direct application in land use and conservation planning

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Science and Practice, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Modeling alternative future scenarios for direct application in land use and conservation planning
Published in
Conservation Science and Practice, April 2023
DOI 10.1111/csp2.12940
Authors

Iara Lacher, Craig Fergus, William J. McShea, Joshua Plisinski, Luca Morreale, Thomas S. Akre

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Other 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Librarian 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 39%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#15,754,982
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Science and Practice
#849
of 1,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,233
of 408,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Science and Practice
#44
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.