| Title |
Translating Marine Animal Tracking Data into Conservation Policy and Management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Graeme C. Hays, Helen Bailey, Steven J. Bograd, W. Don Bowen, Claudio Campagna, Ruth H. Carmichael, Paolo Casale, Andre Chiaradia, Daniel P. Costa, Eduardo Cuevas, P.J. Nico de Bruyn, Maria P. Dias, Carlos M. Duarte, Daniel C. Dunn, Peter H. Dutton, Nicole Esteban, Ari Friedlaender, Kimberly T. Goetz, Brendan J. Godley, Patrick N. Halpin, Mark Hamann, Neil Hammerschlag, Robert Harcourt, Autumn-Lynn Harrison, Elliott L. Hazen, Michelle R. Heupel, Erich Hoyt, Nicolas E. Humphries, Connie Y. Kot, James S.E. Lea, Helene Marsh, Sara M. Maxwell, Clive R. McMahon, Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara, Daniel M. Palacios, Richard A. Phillips, David Righton, Gail Schofield, Jeffrey A. Seminoff, Colin A. Simpfendorfer, David W. Sims, Akinori Takahashi, Michael J. Tetley, Michele Thums, Philip N. Trathan, Stella Villegas-Amtmann, Randall S. Wells, Scott D. Whiting, Natalie E. Wildermann, Ana M.M. Sequeira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 374 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 65 | 17% |
| United States | 41 | 11% |
| Canada | 17 | 5% |
| Australia | 15 | 4% |
| Spain | 9 | 2% |
| France | 7 | 2% |
| Portugal | 5 | 1% |
| Ireland | 4 | 1% |
| South Africa | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 54 | 14% |
| Unknown | 153 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 246 | 66% |
| Scientists | 114 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 655 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 655 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 124 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 93 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 91 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 10% |
| Other | 38 | 6% |
| Other | 63 | 10% |
| Unknown | 179 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 222 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 147 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 2% |
| Engineering | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 48 | 7% |
| Unknown | 200 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 327. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#103,613
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#31
of 3,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,125
of 366,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.