Title |
Diel population and functional synchrony of microbial communities on coral reefs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-09419-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Linda Wegley Kelly, Craig E. Nelson, Andreas F. Haas, Douglas S. Naliboff, Sandi Calhoun, Craig A. Carlson, Robert A. Edwards, Michael D. Fox, Mark Hatay, Maggie D. Johnson, Emily L. A. Kelly, Yan Wei Lim, Saichetana Macherla, Zachary A. Quinlan, Genivaldo Gueiros Z. Silva, Mark J. A. Vermeij, Brian Zgliczynski, Stuart A. Sandin, Jennifer E. Smith, Forest Rohwer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
Denmark | 2 | 5% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
Norway | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 23 | 59% |
Members of the public | 14 | 36% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 25% |
Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
Researcher | 13 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 12% |
Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 26% |
Environmental Science | 16 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 15% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 29 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#690,419
of 25,346,731 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#11,889
of 56,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,538
of 360,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#287
of 1,316 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,346,731 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,316 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.