| Title |
How conspicuous are peacock eyespots and other colorful feathers in the eyes of mammalian predators?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0210924 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzanne Amador Kane, Yuchao Wang, Rui Fang, Yabin Lu, Roslyn Dakin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 83% |
| Scientists | 5 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 33% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#953,334
of 25,600,774 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,332
of 223,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,423
of 364,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#203
of 2,833 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,600,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,833 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.