| Title |
Concurrent visual encounter sampling validates eDNA selectivity and sensitivity for the endangered wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0215586 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas S. Akre, Lillian D. Parker, Ellery Ruther, Jesus E. Maldonado, Lorien Lemmon, Nancy Rotzel McInerney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 22% |
| Researcher | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 16% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,317,431
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#17,209
of 197,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,695
of 350,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#317
of 2,804 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,804 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.