| Title |
Toward a Coordinated Global Observing System for Seagrasses and Marine Macroalgae
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2019.00317 |
| Authors |
J. Emmett Duffy, Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi, Joaquin Trinanes, Frank E. Muller-Karger, Rohani Ambo-Rappe, Christoffer Boström, Alejandro H. Buschmann, Jarrett Byrnes, Robert G. Coles, Joel Creed, Leanne C. Cullen-Unsworth, Guillermo Diaz-Pulido, Carlos M. Duarte, Graham J. Edgar, Miguel Fortes, Gustavo Goni, Chuanmin Hu, Xiaoping Huang, Catriona L. Hurd, Craig Johnson, Brenda Konar, Dorte Krause-Jensen, Kira Krumhansl, Peter Macreadie, Helene Marsh, Len J. McKenzie, Nova Mieszkowska, Patricia Miloslavich, Enrique Montes, Masahiro Nakaoka, Kjell Magnus Norderhaug, Lina M. Norlund, Robert J. Orth, Anchana Prathep, Nathan F. Putman, Jimena Samper-Villarreal, Ester A. Serrao, Frederick Short, Isabel Sousa Pinto, Peter Steinberg, Rick Stuart-Smith, Richard K. F. Unsworth, Mike van Keulen, Brigitta I. van Tussenbroek, Mengqiu Wang, Michelle Waycott, Lauren V. Weatherdon, Thomas Wernberg, Siti Maryam Yaakub |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 9% |
| United States | 7 | 8% |
| Australia | 5 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 39 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 61 | 71% |
| Scientists | 25 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 484 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 484 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 77 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 62 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 90 | 19% |
| Unknown | 130 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 128 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 90 | 19% |
| Engineering | 17 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 62 | 13% |
| Unknown | 159 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2023.
All research outputs
#639,734
of 25,339,932 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#406
of 10,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,559
of 355,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#24
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,339,932 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.