↓ Skip to main content

Survival analysis of confirmed elephant endotheliotropic herpes virus cases in Thailand from 2006 – 2018

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Survival analysis of confirmed elephant endotheliotropic herpes virus cases in Thailand from 2006 – 2018
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0219288
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khajohnpat Boonprasert, Veerasak Punyapornwithaya, Pallop Tankaew, Taweepoke Angkawanish, Supaphen Sriphiboon, Chatchote Titharam, Janine L. Brown, Chaleamchat Somgird

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 17 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,846,653
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#22,556
of 222,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,618
of 362,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#336
of 2,636 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,636 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.