Title |
Drifting in the Caribbean: Hints from the intertidal bivalve Isognomon alatus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Estuarine Coastal & Shelf Science, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106333 |
Authors |
Inês Leal, Augusto A.V. Flores, Rachel Collin, Réjean Tremblay |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Professor | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 5 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 24% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,244,554
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Estuarine Coastal & Shelf Science
#135
of 3,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,241
of 363,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estuarine Coastal & Shelf Science
#6
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.