| Title |
Unexpected species diversity in electric eels with a description of the strongest living bioelectricity generator
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-11690-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. David de Santana, William G. R. Crampton, Casey B. Dillman, Renata G. Frederico, Mark H. Sabaj, Raphaël Covain, Jonathan Ready, Jansen Zuanon, Renildo R. de Oliveira, Raimundo N. Mendes-Júnior, Douglas A. Bastos, Tulio F. Teixeira, Jan Mol, Willian Ohara, Natália Castro e Castro, Luiz A. Peixoto, Cleusa Nagamachi, Leandro Sousa, Luciano F. A. Montag, Frank Ribeiro, Joseph C. Waddell, Nivaldo M. Piorsky, Richard P. Vari, Wolmar B. Wosiacki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 350 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 29 | 8% |
| United States | 27 | 8% |
| Brazil | 25 | 7% |
| Spain | 19 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 7 | 2% |
| Colombia | 5 | 1% |
| Mexico | 5 | 1% |
| France | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 35 | 10% |
| Unknown | 187 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 294 | 84% |
| Scientists | 46 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 23% |
| Unknown | 54 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 65 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1434. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,681
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#175
of 58,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135
of 352,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#7
of 1,485 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,485 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.