| Title |
Total ecosystem carbon stocks of mangroves across broad global environmental and physical gradients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Monographs, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ecm.1405 |
| Authors |
J. Boone Kauffman, Maria Fernanda Adame, Virni Budi Arifanti, Lisa M. Schile‐Beers, Angelo F. Bernardino, Rupesh K. Bhomia, Daniel C. Donato, Ilka C. Feller, Tiago O. Ferreira, Maria del Carmen Jesus Garcia, Richard A. MacKenzie, J. Patrick Megonigal, Daniel Murdiyarso, Lorae Simpson, Humberto Hernández Trejo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| Australia | 5 | 9% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Peru | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Ghana | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 24 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 89% |
| Scientists | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 345 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 62 | 18% |
| Unknown | 105 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 94 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 23 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 9% |
| Unknown | 119 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#732,093
of 25,381,384 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Monographs
#50
of 977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,669
of 367,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Monographs
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.