Title |
Applying the zoo model to conservation of threatened exceptional plant species
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Biology, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1111/cobi.13503 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jordan Wood, Jonathan D. Ballou, Taylor Callicrate, Jeremie B. Fant, M. Patrick Griffith, Andrea T. Kramer, Robert C. Lacy, Abby Meyer, Sara Sullivan, Kathy Traylor‐Holzer, Seana K. Walsh, Kayri Havens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 33% |
Colombia | 2 | 5% |
South Africa | 2 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Israel | 1 | 2% |
Philippines | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 25 | 60% |
Scientists | 14 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 18% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 37% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 24 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2022.
All research outputs
#645,609
of 24,246,771 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#357
of 3,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,603
of 402,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#16
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,246,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.