↓ Skip to main content

Metabarcoding quantifies differences in accumulation of ballast water borne biodiversity among three port systems in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Metabarcoding quantifies differences in accumulation of ballast water borne biodiversity among three port systems in the United States
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, August 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141456
Pubmed ID
Authors

John A. Darling, John Martinson, Katrina M. Pagenkopp Lohan, Katharine J. Carney, Erik Pilgrim, Aabir Banerji, Kimberly K. Holzer, Gregory M. Ruiz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 16 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,564,790
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#15,068
of 30,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,233
of 427,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#493
of 973 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 973 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.