| Title |
Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New Phytologist, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nph.16866 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony P. Walker, Martin G. De Kauwe, Ana Bastos, Soumaya Belmecheri, Katerina Georgiou, Ralph F. Keeling, Sean M. McMahon, Belinda E. Medlyn, David J. P. Moore, Richard J. Norby, Sönke Zaehle, Kristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira, Giovanna Battipaglia, Roel J. W. Brienen, Kristine G. Cabugao, Maxime Cailleret, Elliott Campbell, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Matthew E. Craig, David S. Ellsworth, Graham D. Farquhar, Simone Fatichi, Joshua B. Fisher, David C. Frank, Heather Graven, Lianhong Gu, Vanessa Haverd, Kelly Heilman, Martin Heimann, Bruce A. Hungate, Colleen M. Iversen, Fortunat Joos, Mingkai Jiang, Trevor F. Keenan, Jürgen Knauer, Christian Körner, Victor O. Leshyk, Sebastian Leuzinger, Yao Liu, Natasha MacBean, Yadvinder Malhi, Tim R. McVicar, Josep Penuelas, Julia Pongratz, A. Shafer Powell, Terhi Riutta, Manon E. B. Sabot, Juergen Schleucher, Stephen Sitch, William K. Smith, Benjamin Sulman, Benton Taylor, César Terrer, Margaret S. Torn, Kathleen K. Treseder, Anna T. Trugman, Susan E. Trumbore, Phillip J. van Mantgem, Steve L. Voelker, Mary E. Whelan, Pieter A. Zuidema |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 439 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 105 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 25 | 6% |
| Canada | 17 | 4% |
| Australia | 16 | 4% |
| France | 14 | 3% |
| Germany | 12 | 3% |
| Brazil | 7 | 2% |
| India | 6 | 1% |
| Mexico | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 56 | 13% |
| Unknown | 176 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 249 | 57% |
| Scientists | 171 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 577 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 577 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 104 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 99 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 8% |
| Professor | 29 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 90 | 16% |
| Unknown | 184 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 122 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 104 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 56 | 10% |
| Engineering | 16 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 44 | 8% |
| Unknown | 223 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 405. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2024.
All research outputs
#74,751
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#5
of 9,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,319
of 441,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#1
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.