| Title |
Interspecific competition between resident and wintering birds: experimental evidence and consequences of coexistence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ecy.3208 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luke L. Powell, Elizabeth M. Ames, James R. Wright, Jason Matthiopoulos, Peter P. Marra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Colombia | 2 | 5% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 50% |
| Scientists | 18 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,437,313
of 25,301,208 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#638
of 6,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,500
of 521,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#20
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,301,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.