↓ Skip to main content

Bright carbonate veins on asteroid (101955) Bennu: Implications for aqueous alteration history

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
48 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
85 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Bright carbonate veins on asteroid (101955) Bennu: Implications for aqueous alteration history
Published in
Science, October 2020
DOI 10.1126/science.abc3557
Pubmed ID
Authors

H H Kaplan, D S Lauretta, A A Simon, V E Hamilton, D N DellaGiustina, D R Golish, D C Reuter, C A Bennett, K N Burke, H Campins, H C Connolly, J P Dworkin, J P Emery, D P Glavin, T D Glotch, R Hanna, K Ishimaru, E R Jawin, T J McCoy, N Porter, S A Sandford, S Ferrone, B E Clark, J-Y Li, X-D Zou, M G Daly, O S Barnouin, J A Seabrook, H L Enos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 34 50%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 21 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 461. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#59,923
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Science
#2,269
of 83,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,988
of 436,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#80
of 985 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 985 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.