| Title |
Tree height and leaf drought tolerance traits shape growth responses across droughts in a temperate broadleaf forest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New Phytologist, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nph.16996 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ian R. McGregor, Ryan Helcoski, Norbert Kunert, Alan J. Tepley, Erika B. Gonzalez‐Akre, Valentine Herrmann, Joseph Zailaa, Atticus E. L. Stovall, Norman A. Bourg, William J. McShea, Neil Pederson, Lawren Sack, Kristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 35% |
| Mexico | 3 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 54% |
| Scientists | 17 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,707,722
of 24,592,508 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#1,618
of 9,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,580
of 518,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#58
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,592,508 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.