| Title |
The value of local ecological knowledge to guide tree species selection in tropical dry forest restoration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Restoration Ecology, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/rec.13347 |
| Authors |
Tobias Fremout, Claudia Elena Gutiérrez‐Miranda, Siebe Briers, José Luis Marcelo‐Peña, Eduardo Cueva‐Ortiz, Reynaldo Linares‐Palomino, María de los Ángeles La Torre‐Cuadros, Janette Cristina Chang‐Ruíz, Tania Libertad Villegas‐Gómez, Arantza Helen Acosta‐Flota, Dominiek Plouvier, Rachel Atkinson, Manuel Charcape‐Ravelo, Zhofre Aguirre‐Mendoza, Bart Muys, Evert Thomas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 20% |
| Peru | 3 | 12% |
| Belgium | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 68% |
| Scientists | 7 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,266,353
of 24,394,820 outputs
Outputs from Restoration Ecology
#110
of 1,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,457
of 425,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Restoration Ecology
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,394,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.