You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prescribed burning impacts avian diversity and disadvantages woodland-specialist birds unless long-unburnt habitat is retained
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.09.005 |
| Authors |
Thomas A.A. Prowse, Stuart J. Collard, Alice Blackwood, Patrick J. O'Connor, Steven Delean, Megan Barnes, Phillip Cassey, Hugh P. Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 10 | 30% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 79% |
| Scientists | 7 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,048,518
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,652
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,213
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#31
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.