You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
It takes a community to conceive: an analysis of the scope, nature and accuracy of online sources of health information for couples trying to conceive
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.08.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie G.E. Kedzior, Tina Bianco-Miotto, James Breen, Kerrilyn R. Diener, Martin Donnelley, Kylie R. Dunning, Megan A.S. Penno, John E. Schjenken, David J. Sharkey, Nicolette A. Hodyl, Tod Fullston, Maria Gardiner, Hannah M. Brown, Alice R. Rumbold |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 12 | 86% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 37 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,186,557
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online
#51
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,268
of 363,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.