| Title |
Identification of cell type specific ACE2 modifiers by CRISPR screening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Pathogens, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010377 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily J. Sherman, Carmen Mirabelli, Vi T. Tang, Taslima G. Khan, Kyle Leix, Andrew A. Kennedy, Sarah E. Graham, Cristen J. Willer, Andrew W. Tai, Jonathan Z. Sexton, Christiane E. Wobus, Brian T. Emmer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 57% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,799,671
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Pathogens
#1,661
of 9,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,637
of 450,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Pathogens
#28
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.