| Title |
Phase 2 of extracellular RNA communication consortium charts next-generation approaches for extracellular RNA research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
iScience, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104653 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bogdan Mateescu, Jennifer C. Jones, Roger P. Alexander, Eric Alsop, Ji Yeong An, Mohammad Asghari, Alex Boomgarden, Laura Bouchareychas, Alfonso Cayota, Hsueh-Chia Chang, Al Charest, Daniel T. Chiu, Robert J. Coffey, Saumya Das, Peter De Hoff, Andrew deMello, Crislyn D’Souza-Schorey, David Elashoff, Kiarash R. Eliato, Jeffrey L. Franklin, David J. Galas, Mark B. Gerstein, Ionita H. Ghiran, David B. Go, Stephen Gould, Tristan R. Grogan, James N. Higginbotham, Florian Hladik, Tony Jun Huang, Xiaoye Huo, Elizabeth Hutchins, Dennis K. Jeppesen, Tijana Jovanovic-Talisman, Betty Y.S. Kim, Sung Kim, Kyoung-Mee Kim, Yong Kim, Robert R. Kitchen, Vaughan Knouse, Emily L. LaPlante, Carlito B. Lebrilla, L. James Lee, Kathleen M. Lennon, Guoping Li, Feng Li, Tieyi Li, Tao Liu, Zirui Liu, Adam L. Maddox, Kyle McCarthy, Bessie Meechoovet, Nalin Maniya, Yingchao Meng, Aleksandar Milosavljevic, Byoung-Hoon Min, Amber Morey, Martin Ng, John Nolan, Getulio P. De Oliveira, Michael E. Paulaitis, Tuan Anh Phu, Robert L. Raffai, Eduardo Reátegui, Matthew E. Roth, David A. Routenberg, Joel Rozowsky, Joseph Rufo, Satyajyoti Senapati, Sigal Shachar, Himani Sharma, Anil K. Sood, Stavros Stavrakis, Alessandra Stürchler, Muneesh Tewari, Juan P. Tosar, Alexander K. Tucker-Schwartz, Andrey Turchinovich, Nedyalka Valkov, Kendall Van Keuren-Jensen, Kasey C. Vickers, Lucia Vojtech, Wyatt N. Vreeland, Ceming Wang, Kai Wang, ZeYu Wang, Joshua A. Welsh, Kenneth W. Witwer, David T.W. Wong, Jianping Xia, Ya-Hong Xie, Kaichun Yang, Mikołaj P. Zaborowski, Chenguang Zhang, Qin Zhang, Angela M. Zivkovic, Louise C. Laurent |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 44% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 19% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,968,785
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from iScience
#1,468
of 7,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,787
of 444,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from iScience
#95
of 443 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 443 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.