| Title |
KLIPP - a precision CRISPR approach to target structural variant junctions in cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
bioRxiv, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1101/2023.05.10.540176 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Huibin Yang, Radhika Suhas Hulbatte, Alan Kelleher, Natalie Gratsch, Yin Wang, Philip L. Palmbos, Mats Ljungman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,727,582
of 25,878,862 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#6,867
of 8,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,437
of 403,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#88
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,878,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.