| Title |
Comparison of mRNA vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-associated hospitalization by vaccination source: Immunization information systems, electronic medical records, and self-report—IVY Network, February 1–August 31, 2022
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Vaccine, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.05.028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diya Surie, Levi N. Bonnell, Jennifer DeCuir, Manjusha Gaglani, Tresa McNeal, Shekhar Ghamande, Jay S. Steingrub, Nathan I. Shapiro, Laurence W. Busse, Matthew E. Prekker, Ithan D. Peltan, Samuel M. Brown, David N. Hager, Harith Ali, Michelle N. Gong, Amira Mohamed, Akram Khan, Jennifer G. Wilson, Nida Qadir, Steven Y. Chang, Adit A. Ginde, David Huynh, Nicholas M. Mohr, Christopher Mallow, Emily T. Martin, Adam S. Lauring, Nicholas J. Johnson, Jonathan D. Casey, Kevin W. Gibbs, Jennie H. Kwon, Adrienne Baughman, James D. Chappell, Kimberly W. Hart, Carlos G. Grijalva, Jillian P. Rhoads, Sydney A. Swan, H. Keipp Talbot, Kelsey N. Womack, Yuwei Zhu, Mark W. Tenforde, Katherine Adams, Wesley H. Self, Meredith L. McMorrow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 50% |
| Argentina | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 69% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,357,000
of 25,529,543 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#7,436
of 16,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,704
of 394,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#81
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,529,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.