| Title |
Evidence‐based consensus guidelines for ALS genetic testing and counseling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/acn3.51895 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Roggenbuck, Breda H. F. Eubank, Joshua Wright, Matthew B. Harms, Stephen J. Kolb, Senda Ajroud‐Driss, Ximena Arcila Londono, Gregory Bauer, Michael Benatar, Richard Bedlack, Benjamin Rix Brooks, Chelsea Chambers, Farid F. Chehab, Laynie Dratch, Elizabeth A. Harrington, Lauren Elman, Joseph Americo Fernandes, Laura Foster, Carlayne E. Jackson, Jamie C. Fong, Summer Gibson, Jonathan D. Glass, Stephen Goutman, Namita A. Goyal, Kelly Gwathmey, Paul Larkin, Mahesh M. Mansukhani, Weiyi Mu, Nicholas T. Olney, Erik P. Pioro, John Russo, Nadia Sethi, Carly Siskind, Jeffrey Statland, Marka M. van Blitterswijk, David Walk, Michael Weiss |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 21% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#483,524
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
#38
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,931
of 355,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.