↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Translational toxicoepigenetic Meta-Analyses identify homologous gene DNA methylation reprogramming following developmental phthalate and lead exposure in mouse and human offspring

Overview of attention for article published in Environment International, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
Title
Translational toxicoepigenetic Meta-Analyses identify homologous gene DNA methylation reprogramming following developmental phthalate and lead exposure in mouse and human offspring
Published in
Environment International, March 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108575
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebekah L Petroff, Dana C Dolinoy, Kai Wang, Luke Montrose, Vasantha Padmanabhan, Karen E Peterson, Douglas M Ruden, Maureen A Sartor, Laurie K Svoboda, Martha M Téllez-Rojo, Jaclyn M Goodrich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,260,503
of 25,564,614 outputs
Outputs from Environment International
#2,778
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,938
of 207,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment International
#29
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,564,614 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.