You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Failing to Ignore: Paradoxical Neural Effects of Perceptual Load on Early Attentional Selection in Normal Aging
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Neuroscience, November 2010
|
DOI | 10.1523/jneurosci.2687-10.2010 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Taylor W. Schmitz, Frederick H. T. Cheng, Eve De Rosa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
Canada | 3 | 2% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Hungary | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 112 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 24% |
Researcher | 25 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 16% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 14% |
Unknown | 18 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 60 | 48% |
Neuroscience | 15 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 2% |
Unknown | 22 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2016.
All research outputs
#18,436,183
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#20,919
of 23,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,687
of 100,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#215
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.