↓ Skip to main content

Failing to Ignore: Paradoxical Neural Effects of Perceptual Load on Early Attentional Selection in Normal Aging

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Failing to Ignore: Paradoxical Neural Effects of Perceptual Load on Early Attentional Selection in Normal Aging
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, November 2010
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.2687-10.2010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taylor W. Schmitz, Frederick H. T. Cheng, Eve De Rosa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Canada 3 2%
Germany 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 112 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 24%
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 60 48%
Neuroscience 15 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 22 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2016.
All research outputs
#18,436,183
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#20,919
of 23,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,687
of 100,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#215
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.