| Title |
Controversies in optimal anemia management: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Conference
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Kidney International, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.kint.2021.03.020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jodie L. Babitt, Michele F. Eisenga, Volker H. Haase, Abhijit V. Kshirsagar, Adeera Levin, Francesco Locatelli, Jolanta Małyszko, Dorine W. Swinkels, Der-Cherng Tarng, Michael Cheung, Michel Jadoul, Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer, Tilman B. Drüeke, Conference Participants, Ali K. Abu-Alfa, Baris Afsar, Amy Barton Pai, Anatole Besarab, Geraldine Biddle Moore, Nicole Casadevall, Aleix Cases, Angel de Francisco, Kai-Uwe Eckardt, Steven Fishbane, Linda F. Fried, Tomas Ganz, Yelena Z. Ginzburg, Rafael Gómez, Lawrence T. Goodnough, Takayuki Hamano, Mark R. Hanudel, Chuan-Ming Hao, Kunitoshi Iseki, Joachim H. Ix, Kirsten L. Johansen, Markus Ketteler, Csaba P. Kovesdy, David E. Leaf, Iain C. Macdougall, Ziad A. Massy, Lawrence P. McMahon, Roberto Minutolo, Takeshi Nakanishi, Elizabeta Nemeth, Gregorio T. Obrador, Patrick S. Parfrey, Hyeong-Cheon Park, Roberto Pecoits-Filho, Bruce M. Robinson, Simon D. Roger, Yatrik M. Shah, Bruce S. Spinowitz, Tetsuhiro Tanaka, Yusuke Tsukamoto, Kriang Tungsanga, Carl P. Walther, Angela Yee-Moon Wang, Myles Wolf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 17 | 16% |
| Spain | 9 | 8% |
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Colombia | 4 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 3% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 3 | 3% |
| Peru | 3 | 3% |
| Guatemala | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 52 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 96 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 187 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 83 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 87 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#558,764
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Kidney International
#124
of 7,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,193
of 457,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kidney International
#13
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.