| Title |
Comparative Effectiveness of Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) Vaccines in Preventing COVID-19 Hospitalizations Among Adults Without Immunocompromising Conditions — United States, March–August 2021
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.15585/mmwr.mm7038e1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wesley H. Self, Mark W. Tenforde, Jillian P. Rhoads, Manjusha Gaglani, Adit A. Ginde, David J. Douin, Samantha M. Olson, H. Keipp Talbot, Jonathan D. Casey, Nicholas M. Mohr, Anne Zepeski, Tresa McNeal, Shekhar Ghamande, Kevin W. Gibbs, D. Clark Files, David N. Hager, Arber Shehu, Matthew E. Prekker, Heidi L. Erickson, Michelle N. Gong, Amira Mohamed, Daniel J. Henning, Jay S. Steingrub, Ithan D. Peltan, Samuel M. Brown, Emily T. Martin, Arnold S. Monto, Akram Khan, Catherine L. Hough, Laurence W. Busse, Caitlin C. ten Lohuis, Abhijit Duggal, Jennifer G. Wilson, Alexandra June Gordon, Nida Qadir, Steven Y. Chang, Christopher Mallow, Carolina Rivas, Hilary M. Babcock, Jennie H. Kwon, Matthew C. Exline, Natasha Halasa, James D. Chappell, Adam S. Lauring, Carlos G. Grijalva, Todd W. Rice, Ian D. Jones, William B. Stubblefield, Adrienne Baughman, Kelsey N. Womack, Christopher J. Lindsell, Kimberly W. Hart, Yuwei Zhu, Lisa Mills, Sandra N. Lester, Megan M. Stumpf, Eric A. Naioti, Miwako Kobayashi, Jennifer R. Verani, Natalie J. Thornburg, Manish M. Patel, Nicole Calhoun, Kempapura Murthy, Judy Herrick, Amanda McKillop, Eric Hoffman, Martha Zayed, Michael Smith, Natalie Seattle, Jason Ettlinger, Elisa Priest, Jennifer Thomas, Alejandro Arroliga, Madhava Beeram, Ryan Kindle, Lori-Ann Kozikowski, Lesley De Souza, Scott Ouellette, Sherell Thornton-Thompson, Omar Mehkri, Kiran Ashok, Susan Gole, Alexander King, Bryan Poynter, Nicholas Stanley, Audrey Hendrickson, Ellen Maruggi, Tyler Scharber, Jeffrey Jorgensen, Robert Bowers, Jennifer King, Valerie Aston, Brent Armbruster, Richard E. Rothman, Rahul Nair, Jen-Ting (Tina) Chen, Sarah Karow, Emily Robart, Paulo Nunes Maldonado, Maryiam Khan, Preston So, Joe Levitt, Cynthia Perez, Anita Visweswaran, Jonasel Roque, Adreanne Rivera, Los Angeles, Trevor Frankel, Los Angeles, Jennifer Goff, David Huynh, Michelle Howell, Jennifer Friedel, Michael Tozier, Conner Driver, Michael Carricato, Alexandra Foster, Paul Nassar, Lori Stout, Zita Sibenaller, Alicia Walter, Jasmine Mares, Logan Olson, Bradley Clinansmith, Carolina Rivas, Hayley Gershengorn, EJ McSpadden, Rachel Truscon, Anne Kaniclides, Lara Thomas, Ramsay Bielak, Weronika Damek Valvano, Rebecca Fong, William J. Fitzsimmons, Christopher Blair, Andrew L. Valesano, Julie Gilbert, Christine D. Crider, Kyle A. Steinbock, Thomas C. Paulson, Layla A. Anderson, Christy Kampe, Jakea Johnson, Rendie McHenry, Marcia Blair, Douglas Conway, Mary LaRose, Leigha Landreth, Madeline Hicks, Lisa Parks, Jahnavi Bongu, David McDonald, Candice Cass, Sondra Seiler, David Park, Tiffany Hink, Meghan Wallace, Carey-Ann Burnham, Olivia G. Arter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,611 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 570 | 22% |
| Japan | 140 | 5% |
| Germany | 38 | 1% |
| Spain | 34 | 1% |
| France | 32 | 1% |
| Mexico | 29 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 28 | 1% |
| Canada | 27 | 1% |
| Turkey | 21 | <1% |
| Other | 296 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1396 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2265 | 87% |
| Scientists | 156 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 138 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 52 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 345 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 11% |
| Researcher | 34 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 12% |
| Unknown | 169 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 13% |
| Unknown | 183 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4243. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,096
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#60
of 4,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73
of 437,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#11
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 337.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.