| Title |
Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing's disease: a guideline update
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2213-8587(21)00235-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Fleseriu, Richard Auchus, Irina Bancos, Anat Ben-Shlomo, Jerome Bertherat, Nienke R Biermasz, Cesar L Boguszewski, Marcello D Bronstein, Michael Buchfelder, John D Carmichael, Felipe F Casanueva, Frederic Castinetti, Philippe Chanson, James Findling, Mônica Gadelha, Eliza B Geer, Andrea Giustina, Ashley Grossman, Mark Gurnell, Ken Ho, Adriana G Ioachimescu, Ursula B Kaiser, Niki Karavitaki, Laurence Katznelson, Daniel F Kelly, André Lacroix, Ann McCormack, Shlomo Melmed, Mark Molitch, Pietro Mortini, John Newell-Price, Lynnette Nieman, Alberto M Pereira, Stephan Petersenn, Rosario Pivonello, Hershel Raff, Martin Reincke, Roberto Salvatori, Carla Scaroni, Ilan Shimon, Constantine A Stratakis, Brooke Swearingen, Antoine Tabarin, Yutaka Takahashi, Marily Theodoropoulou, Stylianos Tsagarakis, Elena Valassi, Elena V Varlamov, Greisa Vila, John Wass, Susan M Webb, Maria C Zatelli, Beverly M K Biller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 841 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 82 | 10% |
| Mexico | 65 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 47 | 6% |
| United States | 42 | 5% |
| Colombia | 35 | 4% |
| India | 18 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 16 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 15 | 2% |
| Peru | 12 | 1% |
| Other | 125 | 15% |
| Unknown | 384 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 659 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 114 | 14% |
| Scientists | 56 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 1% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 338 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 35 | 10% |
| Researcher | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 18% |
| Unknown | 142 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 133 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 6% |
| Unknown | 153 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 566. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#42,861
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
#53
of 2,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,271
of 443,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.