| Title |
The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Sports Medicine, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096743 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D R Griffin, E J Dickenson, J O'Donnell, R Agricola, T Awan, M Beck, J C Clohisy, H P Dijkstra, E Falvey, M Gimpel, R S Hinman, P Hölmich, A Kassarjian, H D Martin, R Martin, R C Mather, M J Philippon, M P Reiman, A Takla, K Thorborg, S Walker, A Weir, K L Bennell |
| Abstract |
The 2016 Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome was convened to build an international, multidisciplinary consensus on the diagnosis and management of patients with FAI syndrome. 22 panel members and 1 patient from 9 countries and 5 different specialties participated in a 1-day consensus meeting on 29 June 2016. Prior to the meeting, 6 questions were agreed on, and recent relevant systematic reviews and seminal literature were circulated. Panel members gave presentations on the topics of the agreed questions at Sports Hip 2016, an open meeting held in the UK on 27-29 June. Presentations were followed by open discussion. At the 1-day consensus meeting, panel members developed statements in response to each question through open discussion; members then scored their level of agreement with each response on a scale of 0-10. Substantial agreement (range 9.5-10) was reached for each of the 6 consensus questions, and the associated terminology was agreed on. The term 'femoroacetabular impingement syndrome' was introduced to reflect the central role of patients' symptoms in the disorder. To reach a diagnosis, patients should have appropriate symptoms, positive clinical signs and imaging findings. Suitable treatments are conservative care, rehabilitation, and arthroscopic or open surgery. Current understanding of prognosis and topics for future research were discussed. The 2016 Warwick Agreement on FAI syndrome is an international multidisciplinary agreement on the diagnosis, treatment principles and key terminology relating to FAI syndrome.Author note The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome has been endorsed by the following 25 clinical societies: American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports and Exercise Medicine (ACPSEM), Australasian College of Sports and Exercise Physicians (ACSEP), Austian Sports Physiotherapists, British Association of Sports and Exercise Medicine (BASEM), British Association of Sport Rehabilitators and Trainers (BASRaT), Canadian Academy of Sport and Exercise Medicine (CASEM), Danish Society of Sports Physical Therapy (DSSF), European College of Sports and Exercise Physicians (ECOSEP), European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA), Finnish Sports Physiotherapist Association (SUFT), German-Austrian-Swiss Society for Orthopaedic Traumatologic Sports Medicine (GOTS), International Federation of Sports Physical Therapy (IFSPT), International Society for Hip Arthroscopy (ISHA), Groupo di Interesse Specialistico dell'A.I.F.I., Norwegian Association of Sports Medicine and Physical Activity (NIMF), Norwegian Sports Physiotherapy Association (FFI), Society of Sports Therapists (SST), South African Sports Medicine Association (SASMA), Sports Medicine Australia (SMA), Sports Doctors Australia (SDrA), Sports Physiotherapy New Zealand (SPNZ), Swedish Society of Exercise and Sports Medicine (SFAIM), Swiss Society of Sports Medicine (SGMS/SGSM), Swiss Sports Physiotherapy Association (SSPA). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 658 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 134 | 20% |
| United States | 80 | 12% |
| Australia | 39 | 6% |
| Spain | 31 | 5% |
| Canada | 25 | 4% |
| Ireland | 20 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 17 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 14 | 2% |
| Denmark | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 77 | 12% |
| Unknown | 211 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 472 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 94 | 14% |
| Scientists | 80 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 1% |
| Unknown | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1277 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 244 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 158 | 12% |
| Other | 142 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 106 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 86 | 7% |
| Other | 232 | 18% |
| Unknown | 315 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 358 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 324 | 25% |
| Sports and Recreations | 120 | 9% |
| Engineering | 20 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 1% |
| Other | 82 | 6% |
| Unknown | 364 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 471. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2023.
All research outputs
#58,365
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#163
of 6,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,196
of 331,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#9
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.