| Title |
Effectiveness of mRNA Vaccination in Preventing COVID-19–Associated Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Death — United States, March 2021–January 2022
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.15585/mmwr.mm7112e1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark W. Tenforde, Wesley H. Self, Manjusha Gaglani, Adit A. Ginde, David J. Douin, H. Keipp Talbot, Jonathan D. Casey, Nicholas M. Mohr, Anne Zepeski, Tresa McNeal, Shekhar Ghamande, Kevin W. Gibbs, D. Clark Files, David N. Hager, Arber Shehu, Matthew E. Prekker, Anne E. Frosch, Michelle N. Gong, Amira Mohamed, Nicholas J. Johnson, Vasisht Srinivasan, Jay S. Steingrub, Ithan D. Peltan, Samuel M. Brown, Emily T. Martin, Arnold S. Monto, Akram Khan, Catherine L. Hough, Laurence W. Busse, Abhijit Duggal, Jennifer G. Wilson, Nida Qadir, Steven Y. Chang, Christopher Mallow, Carolina Rivas, Hilary M. Babcock, Jennie H. Kwon, Matthew C. Exline, Mena Botros, Adam S. Lauring, Nathan I. Shapiro, Natasha Halasa, James D. Chappell, Carlos G. Grijalva, Todd W. Rice, Ian D. Jones, William B. Stubblefield, Adrienne Baughman, Kelsey N. Womack, Jillian P. Rhoads, Christopher J. Lindsell, Kimberly W. Hart, Yuwei Zhu, Katherine Adams, Diya Surie, Meredith L. McMorrow, Manish M. Patel, IVY Network |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,324 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 377 | 28% |
| Japan | 81 | 6% |
| Canada | 24 | 2% |
| Turkey | 15 | 1% |
| Spain | 10 | <1% |
| Australia | 10 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | <1% |
| India | 7 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 105 | 8% |
| Unknown | 681 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1136 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 80 | 6% |
| Scientists | 78 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 30 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 63 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 65 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2418. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,308
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#139
of 4,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157
of 448,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#12
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 335.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.