↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Heart Rhythm, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
56 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy
Published in
Heart Rhythm, April 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.04.023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman, Dipen Zalavadia, Abdul Haseeb, Cicely Dye, Nidhi Madan, Jamario Renaldo Skeete, Sharath C Vipparthy, Wilson Young, Venkatesh Ravi, Clement Rajakumar, Parash Pokharel, Timothy Larsen, Henry D Huang, Randle H Storm, Jess W Oren, Syeda Atiqa Batul, Richard G Trohman, Faiz A Subzposh, Parikshit S Sharma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Other 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 22 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 50%
Engineering 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 23 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#702,202
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Heart Rhythm
#126
of 4,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,890
of 446,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Rhythm
#5
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.