| Title |
Use of Novel Strategies to Develop Guidelines for Management of Pyogenic Osteomyelitis in Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.11321 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brad Spellberg, Gloria Aggrey, Meghan B. Brennan, Brent Footer, Graeme Forrest, Fergus Hamilton, Emi Minejima, Jessica Moore, Jaimo Ahn, Michael Angarone, Robert M. Centor, Kartikeya Cherabuddi, Jennifer Curran, Kusha Davar, Joshua Davis, Mei Qin Dong, Bassam Ghanem, Doug Hutcheon, Philipp Jent, Minji Kang, Rachael Lee, Emily G. McDonald, Andrew M. Morris, Rebecca Reece, Ilan S. Schwartz, Miranda So, Steven Tong, Christopher Tucker, Noah Wald-Dickler, Erica J. Weinstein, Riley Williams, Christina Yen, Shiwei Zhou, Todd C. Lee, Rachel Baden, Samuel Bedard-Dallare, Claudia Beltran, Michelle Blythe, Eric Brass, Sharon Chi, Chase Coffey, Mallory Cowart, Alejandro Diaz, John Dwyer, Alejandro Jordan Villegas, Ezza Khan, Jose Martinez, Arun Mattappallil, Nessa Meshkaty, Arun Patel, Matthew Pullen, Sujatha Rajan, Lynora Saxinger, Rhagavendra Tirupathi, Julie Trivedi, Gabriel Vilchez-Molina, Dominique Werge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 440 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 111 | 25% |
| Canada | 27 | 6% |
| Spain | 17 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 3% |
| Mexico | 12 | 3% |
| Japan | 5 | 1% |
| Colombia | 5 | 1% |
| Peru | 5 | 1% |
| Chile | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 69 | 16% |
| Unknown | 171 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 301 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 85 | 19% |
| Scientists | 49 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 580. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#41,132
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#446
of 9,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,340
of 447,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#25
of 556 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 128.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 556 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.