| Title |
Implementing patient navigation programs: Considerations and lessons learned from the Alliance to Advance Patient‐Centered Cancer Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer (0008543X), May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/cncr.34251 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth S. Ver Hoeve, Melissa A. Simon, Sankirtana M. Danner, Antonio J. Washington, Susan D. Coples, Sanja Percac‐Lima, Emma C. Whited, Electra D. Paskett, Michelle J. Naughton, Darrell M. Gray, Jennifer A. Wenzel, James R. Zabora, Ahmed Hassoon, Elliott E. Tolbert, Elizabeth Calhoun, Debra L. Barton, Christopher R. Friese, Marita G. Titler, Heidi A. Hamann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 45% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Guinea | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
| Scientists | 5 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,427,819
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Cancer (0008543X)
#1,174
of 14,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,801
of 444,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer (0008543X)
#24
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.