↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Media Use in School-Aged Children and Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 17,913)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
421 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
776 Mendeley
Title
Media Use in School-Aged Children and Adolescents
Published in
Pediatrics, November 2016
DOI 10.1542/peds.2016-2592
Pubmed ID
Authors

COUNCIL ON COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA

Abstract

This policy statement focuses on children and adolescents 5 through 18 years of age. Research suggests both benefits and risks of media use for the health of children and teenagers. Benefits include exposure to new ideas and knowledge acquisition, increased opportunities for social contact and support, and new opportunities to access health-promotion messages and information. Risks include negative health effects on weight and sleep; exposure to inaccurate, inappropriate, or unsafe content and contacts; and compromised privacy and confidentiality. Parents face challenges in monitoring their children's and their own media use and in serving as positive role models. In this new era, evidence regarding healthy media use does not support a one-size-fits-all approach. Parents and pediatricians can work together to develop a Family Media Use Plan (www.healthychildren.org/MediaUsePlan) that considers their children's developmental stages to individualize an appropriate balance for media time and consistent rules about media use, to mentor their children, to set boundaries for accessing content and displaying personal information, and to implement open family communication about media.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 776 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 773 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 116 15%
Student > Bachelor 109 14%
Researcher 63 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 57 7%
Other 144 19%
Unknown 225 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 141 18%
Psychology 87 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 74 10%
Social Sciences 71 9%
Sports and Recreations 21 3%
Other 118 15%
Unknown 264 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2401. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,339
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#23
of 17,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30
of 318,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#3
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.