| Title |
IL-15 Superagonist NAI in BCG-Unresponsive Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NEJM Evidence, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1056/evidoa2200167 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karim Chamie, Sam S Chang, Eugene Kramolowsky, Mark L Gonzalgo, Piyush Kumar Agarwal, Jeffrey C Bassett, Marc Bjurlin, Michael L Cher, William Clark, Barrett E Cowan, Richard David, Evan Goldfischer, Khurshid Guru, Mark W Jalkut, Samuel D Kaffenberger, Jed Kaminetsky, Aaron E Katz, Alec S Koo, Wade J Sexton, Sergei N Tikhonenkov, Edouard J Trabulsi, Andrew F Trainer, Patricia Spilman, Megan Huang, Paul Bhar, Sharif A Taha, Lennie Sender, Sandeep Reddy, Patrick Soon-Shiong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 187 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 74 | 40% |
| Spain | 9 | 5% |
| Brazil | 6 | 3% |
| France | 5 | 3% |
| Italy | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Turkey | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 53 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 100 | 53% |
| Scientists | 43 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 28% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 266. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#139,809
of 25,898,387 outputs
Outputs from NEJM Evidence
#30
of 341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,949
of 443,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NEJM Evidence
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,898,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 75.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.