| Title |
Comparing Very Low-Carbohydrate vs DASH Diets for Overweight or Obese Adults With Hypertension and Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Family Medicine, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1370/afm.2968 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura R Saslow, Lenette M Jones, Ananda Sen, Julia A Wolfson, Heidi L Diez, Alison O'Brien, Cindy W Leung, Hovig Bayandorian, Jennifer Daubenmier, Amanda L Missel, Caroline Richardson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 777 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 189 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 44 | 6% |
| Canada | 23 | 3% |
| Australia | 19 | 2% |
| Germany | 9 | 1% |
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| Mexico | 7 | <1% |
| France | 7 | <1% |
| India | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 62 | 8% |
| Unknown | 404 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 611 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 105 | 14% |
| Scientists | 52 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 14 | 21% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 35 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 14 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 36 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1183. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#12,348
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Family Medicine
#3
of 1,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#370
of 392,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Family Medicine
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.