| Title |
General Health Checks in Adults for Reducing Morbidity and Mortality From Disease: Summary Review of Primary Findings and Conclusions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3187 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Allan V Prochazka, Tanner Caverly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 60% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 23% |
| Scientists | 7 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 38% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 31% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 46% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2018.
All research outputs
#672,858
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#2,369
of 11,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,432
of 209,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#25
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.