| Title |
Economic Effects of Medicaid Expansion in Michigan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmp1613981 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Z Ayanian, Gabriel M Ehrlich, Donald R Grimes, Helen Levy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 503 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 289 | 57% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Colombia | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 185 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 362 | 72% |
| Scientists | 80 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 45 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 16 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 25% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 14% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1006. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#16,310
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#705
of 32,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282
of 424,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#10
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.